From:
id:278
ip
logged
| Angus | Posted on: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:12:56 +0800 |
From: |
文章分享: 切勿輕率填海 東方日報 2005-06-13 ---------------------------------------- 為了明日有更好的發展，香港必須因時制宜，升檢討城市規劃及發展，但作決定前，必須小心衡量所付出的代價，特別要保護我們珍貴的海港。 譬如說，不少人都領受過中環塞車之苦。另一方面，市民及旅客亦很渴望盡享港島沿岸的海濱美景，但魚與熊掌，是否可以同時兼得呢？ 政府在三年前，提出填海二十六公頃，用作興建中環灣仔繞道，同時想將灣仔海濱搖身一變為旅遊及康樂中心。構想本意是好，但是政府填海愈填愈窄，填出來的地，不止用作起路，還包括海濱長廊、商業樓宇，即是非必要地填海，卒之方案在法院判決違反《保護海港條例》及在社會一片嘩然聲中擱置。 有關方面其後改為拋出三個方案公開諮詢，分別需要填海十至二十五公頃，但當局這副「胸有成竹」的模樣，令公眾有被迫「三揀一」的印象，方案卒之又要撤回。 共建維港委員會近日又捲土重來，重新公開諮詢灣仔、銅鑼灣及鄰近地區海濱研究計畫，在舊有的三個方案基礎上，再提出兩個新方案，但是詳細資料，如每個方案需填海多少，卻完全欠奉。據稱理由是為了顯示政府沒有既定立場，一切構想細節都可以更改，他們想聽市民所想，只怕來得有點天馬行空。 而今次諮詢的範圍極廣，包括應否在海濱提供一個直升機場作政府及商業用途？地鐵港島線應否延至西區？應否興建更多渡輪碼頭？相信連串的課題，的確很值得大家仔細思量，再向政府表達我們希望日後的維港新貌，究竟是哪個模樣。 自由黨稍後也會詳加研究這系列方案，但原則仍然堅持維港是香港寶貴的天然資源，能不填海便應盡量不填。田北俊 田北俊/ 周梁淑怡 |
| sam | Posted on: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:27:48 +0800 |
From:HK |
發 表 對 [ 蘋 論 ： 不 填 海 難 解 中 區 交 通 死 結 ] 的 意 見： (編者按：讀者沒有署名) 於 23/02/2005 22:57PM 發 表 對 [ 蘋 論 ： 不 填 海 難 解 中 區 交 通 死 結 ] 的 意 見： 「填海興建中環灣仔繞道絕對不是解決交通擠塞的良好辦法 電子道路收費明顯遠為優勝 立法會議員的提議有見地. 即使基於地理因素令香港實施電子道路收費計劃的成效不及倫敦 但減少汽車流量大約兩成 是頗為合理的預期 (視乎收費水平) ; 果如是 中區的交通擠塞問題必然大幅改善 而本港 的核心金融商業區會加速向港島東西兩方及九龍半島擴散. 」(id:20050223225712962) Stupid 於 23/02/2005 19:29PM 發 表 對 [ 蘋 論 ： 不 填 海 難 解 中 區 交 通 死 結 ] 的 意 見： 「Stupid and native. Do you know traffic jam is absolutely can not solve by how many "road" you make thats why you need MTR or other mass transportion equipment. How stupid you are? Shame on you!」(id:20050223192916601) sam 於 23/02/2005 09:47AM 發 表 對 [ 蘋 論 ： 不 填 海 難 解 中 區 交 通 死 結 ] 的 意 見： 「本人並不認同今日的蘋論 因為道路一通行無阻 某一些商人又會在商業區將舊的不是很高層的 商業大廈重建為新的及更高的商業大樓 到時會有更多人入去辦公 到時會有更多公司車輛及職員車 輛使用 到10年20年後又要檢查道路的負荷量 又不足夠用啦 這是一個小孩子也會明白的道理啊!」 (id:20050223094731799) sam 於 23/02/2005 10:00AM 發 表 對 [ 蘋 論 ： 不 填 海 難 解 中 區 交 通 死 結 ] 的 意 見： 「依據現在的塞車問題是最佳的 讓那一區塞一塞車 那麼樣很多公司或是有錢商人將會轉移至其他 地方建築商業大樓 永無止境的填海造地是行不通的啊 減少車輛的增加及呼籲有錢人多一點用公共 交通工具才是良策啊 您們可以帶頭呼籲有錢人搭乘公共交通工具一個星期 看一看問題是否可以解決!」 (id:20050223100011281) |
| Socie | Posted on: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:46:39 +0800 |
From: |
我們有中文版 http://www.friendsoftheharbour.org/main_chi.php |
| Dawso | Posted on: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:42:19 +0800 |
From:Hong Kong |
如果此網貢有中文版本，相信有更多人會看和了解更多。 |
| Natal | Posted on: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:52:44 +0800 |
From: |
我們應怎樣平衡環保和發展??? |
| Socie | Posted on: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:47:53 +0800 |
From: |
Dear Friends of Harbour Society for Protection of Harbour will held a public campaign which proposed on March 6th 2005 to hand in over 100 000 citizens's signature. We will also build a "Heart" puzzle by our participant. Hope to see you all and we can have enough voice to ask government to minimise/stop reclamation and no land sell in the new reclamed land. Thank you and see you all soon! Soc. for protection of Harbour |
| willi | Posted on: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:07:53 +0800 |
From:Nanjing, P.R.C. |
Happy New Year to everyone and our dear webmaster! |
| TONY | Posted on: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:01:16 +0800 |
From: |
維港不死 |
| SnicL | Posted on: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:05:08 +0800 |
From: |
Actually Victory Harbour was very nice...but now it is not good...because all the reasons were from people did not know how to protect the HongKong harbour... |
| A LAO | Posted on: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:57:07 +0800 |
From:London UK |
Mr Winston Chu just spoke to us at UCL few hours ago. It gave me a better understanding of the land reclamation and how it affected the harbour over past decades. I am relieved that this group amongst other in HK to speak up and protect the harbour from the hands of the government (PlanD) and developers. I will definitely support this movement and hope that after my graduation at UCL will allow me to aid in one way ot the other! Keep up the good work! |
| max | Posted on: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:09:13 +0800 |
From: |
Ur site looks great!!!!!!!!!! |
| Peter | Posted on: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 02:56:59 +0800 |
From:New York
|
Hello |
| Jenny | Posted on: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:16:48 +0800 |
From: |
great!! |
| steve | Posted on: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 05:27:11 +0800 |
From:California
|
Hello from Cali. Cool site indeed! |
| Frede | Posted on: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:00:49 +0800 |
From:New York
|
Nice dsign. Regards. |
| Nill | Posted on: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:17:34 +0800 |
From: |
I appreciate your effort and hard work a lot and I'll try to help as much as I can! Good luck and hope you'll succeed in saving our harbour! |
| free | Posted on: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:26:57 +0800 |
From:New York
|
Very nice design. Simple but nice :) |
| Angel | Posted on: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:30:50 +0800 |
From:HK |
Thank you for your time & effort:) |
| reali | Posted on: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:42:20 +0800 |
From: |
Thank you for developing this very good site ! |
| troja | Posted on: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 22:30:10 +0800 |
From: |
Great site thank you for sharing it. |
| handj | Posted on: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 05:57:43 +0800 |
From: |
Gute Webseite! I'll tell my friends about it... )N |
| benso | Posted on: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:17:08 +0800 |
From: |
i like this site very much. support!! |
| Venus | Posted on: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:08:21 +0800 |
From:HKG |
"Victoria Harbour" - how can we destroy/kill her life who is our HK's Tresure. All peoples love her all over the world because of her unique location fascinted scenery (especially at night time) ** Is that the right thing to do this for her? ** |
| vanes | Posted on: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:09:44 +0800 |
From: |
hi!...I will help as much as possible |
| adult | Posted on: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:08:56 +0800 |
From: |
good job ! |
| free | Posted on: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 07:55:42 +0800 |
From: |
Excellent site. Keep up the good work. |
| form | Posted on: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:13:00 +0800 |
From: |
I think that it is a very good site...Since we are doing a group project about saving the harbour your site provides us a lot of useful materials.....THX!!!!! Keep up the good work.... |
| Raymo | Posted on: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:16:40 +0800 |
From: |
Victoria Harbour I miss you! Thanks to all of u your contribution. keep on i will on your back. |
| John | Posted on: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:20:11 +0800 |
From: |
Very interesting site! |
| Phili | Posted on: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:12:30 +0800 |
From:HK |
Love Our Harbour! Protect Our Harbour! |
| sex s | Posted on: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 01:20:17 +0800 |
From: |
Your site is really good. |
| Derek | Posted on: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:49:33 +0800 |
From: |
The Wanchai harbour front is already a mess the one outside IFC II is simply a junk yard and the TST one looks like a silly walkway. Why can't the government do something right for a change? |
| David | Posted on: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:16:13 +0800 |
From:Tai Po |
I just read the newspaper and found that your value information should be spreaded out and let all HK ppl know (even outside HK). Now I'd like to suggest: 1) add web copies of the newspaper advertisement in the website. In addition please leave the link such that all "netizen" can forward this message out. 2) Put printable form (PDF or JPEG) and let ppl to print out and sign. Hope it can help more ppl know the truth! Welldone. |
| CM | Posted on: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 23:49:38 +0800 |
From: Hong-Kong |
Thank you for having put together this website - Hong-Kong needs it. |
| Brown | Posted on: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:02:00 +0800 |
From: |
Work hard! Protect our harbour! |
| Abde | Posted on: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:22:28 +0800 |
From:Bandung |
nice website...good luck |
| Waiti | Posted on: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 01:46:06 +0800 |
From: |
I visit this website after reading the advertisement on newspaper. I suggest to add a pdf/html version of the advertisement in the web. Those demonstration photo of the harbourfront is really shocking! I hope that more people can feel what I feel. We can forward the URL by ICQ and email! |
| Ryan | Posted on: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 17:30:51 +0800 |
From:Hong Kong |
It is absoluting frustrating to see the Victoria Harbour being destroyed by the Government. We must act together and make the message clear to the Government - % of Honghongers prefer to STOP THE RELAMATION. |
| Dupon | Posted on: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:35:11 +0800 |
From:Paris |
Hong Kong government is above the rule of law ! How come ? Is the government responsive and accountable to the citizen ? Shame on You ! It's a very bad example to citizen if you expect the HK citizen to respect the Law because the government does not comply with the law itself . How come the citizen could trust and follow the governement ? Is this a Democracy ?????? In France if government violates law it has to be sanctioned |
| joe | Posted on: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 01:52:01 +0800 |
From:hk |
Hong Kong is hopeless as long as we're still under the rule of a government that always acts in bad faith. I strongly condemn the reclamation. Give us back our invaluable harbour! |
| scat | Posted on: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 01:11:08 +0800 |
From: |
Hello! Nice site! |
| texas | Posted on: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:17:38 +0800 |
From:New York
|
Hello. Where did you get your goestbook script? |
| anal | Posted on: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 02:42:10 +0800 |
From: |
Your site is really good. |
| porn | Posted on: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 03:17:00 +0800 |
From: |
Thank you for maintaining such a great site. God bless you! |
| adult | Posted on: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 03:21:58 +0800 |
From: |
Excellent website very informative. Keep up the excellent work |
| adult | Posted on: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 07:49:51 +0800 |
From: |
Hello! Nice site! |
| HongK | Posted on: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:34:35 +0800 |
From: |
建議成立"填平維港，行路過海"聯席會議，以迎合特區政府填海的陰謀。 強烈要求特區政府把規劃及環境地政局局長孫明揚同志停薪留職，並請他找英女皇或英國政府支薪，因為他堅持"填海計劃"是港英政府時代已擬定，。 |
| kfc | Posted on: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:24:10 +0800 |
From: |
pls remember to defend the harbour today. 1/7 can be a festival for HK if we can protect our values and treasures. keep the gesture up. |
| Natha | Posted on: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:32:47 +0800 |
From: |
Tung Chee Hwa and the HK gov is so stupid! Build more roads traffic will only increase and create more congestion. Protecting the harbour is not just about the environment it is a vital part of HK's heritage as well!! |
| LAI | Posted on: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:25:29 +0800 |
From: |
母與子的故事 作者︰馮而禮 從前有一對母子，很窮，什麼也沒有，別人也不屑一顧 後來作兒子的發現母親其實很美麗，就把此事宣揚開去 結果，真的有很多好奇之仕來到這兩母子的村落 漸漸人們發現這位母親不但美麗，而且聰慧能幹， 便開始叫這位母親幫忙工作，兒子也努力幫忙， 同時為了讓母親的美麗不減，便替她添置了很多飾物。 兒子漸漸成材，作為母親的依然不斷為兒子作出支援。 這村子漸漸富裕起來 人們來到這裡，都是想請兒子幫忙，順便探望傳聞中的美麗母親 兩人的生活本來過得非常幸褔滿足 後來，兒子忙碌起來，與母親談話的機會少了很多很多 但有一天，兒子發現接的工作驟減，影響了豐足的收入， 他才想起美麗的母親， 為了吸引人們多點來這個村子，兒子便為母親添置更多飾物 現在母親看起來華麗多了 兒子以為這樣必能讓世人驚歎母親的艷麗 自己也沒去檢討自己的無能 母親依然為兒子付出所有，但由於身上累贅的飾物，她不能像以往活潑能幹 世人對於母親庸俗的外表也不甚欣賞 漸漸，來這個村落的人越來越少 兒子不能忍受沒有豐衣足食的生活， 兒子怪罪於母親的無能， 兒子真的一點饑餓也不能忍受， 兒子便拿母親血肉來填肚子， 母親一句怨言也沒有。 終於，母親只剩一副添滿華麗衣飾的骨骼。 兒子的工作能力漸漸被時代淘汰， 沒有人來找兒子幫忙， 也沒有人來看那個美麗母親， 最後兒子最終也活活餓死， 聽說，兒子到死也不知道在哪錯了。 一百年後，偶然也有人提起這個故事。 提起曾經美麗的母親， 提起曾經勤奮的兒子， 偶然，有人會懷念母親動人的名字 --維多利亞。 兒子嗎？說故事的人搖搖頭， 兒子有個不合襯的名字， 叫香港。 |
| Posted on: Thu, 27 May 2004 20:38:43 +0800 | |
From: |
reclamation isn't the only way out. the gov says it's bcuz of the "traffic congestion". u need a few years to build the roads and stuff. the traffic will be worse. I soo wanna say to the gov " Use your brains pls....." |
| abc | Posted on: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:52:52 +0800 |
From:HK |
STOP RECLAMATION NOW ! |
| rek0 | Posted on: Mon, 3 May 2004 19:17:11 +0800 |
From: |
i don't want harbour will be a river! |
| Kelvi | Posted on: Thu, 6 May 2004 18:53:25 +0800 |
From: |
There is a heated debate on the recent issue of the harbour reclamation works. Diverse views have been expressed in the community on the legality and scope of the Central reclamation. Phase three of the Central reclamation is one of the two remaining portions of the Central and Wan Chai reclamation which started in the 1990s. Traffic congestion has all along been a serious problem in the business hub of Central. At present east-west traffic on the north side of Hong Kong Island relies mainly on the Connaught Road Central/Harcourt Road/Gloucester Road corridor. The government claims that this has reached its capacity resulting in frequent serious congestion. The comprehensive traffic study conducted by the government shows that there is an urgent need for a new trunk road that is the Central-Wan Chai bypass and other related road systems to solve the serious congestion problem. As early as May 1998 the Town Planning Board gazetted the Draft Central District (Extension) Outline Zoning Plan in accordance with the statutory procedure under the Town Planning Ordinance to allow the public to lodge objections. After consideration of different views and in compliance with the Protection of the Harbour Ordinance the board decided to reduce substantially the scale of the reclamation from the original 38 hectares to 23 hectares opting for the plan with the least reclamation. However many of the general public do not agree with the government and think that the harbour is the public¡¦s property and should not be destroyed. Some groups were formed in recent years. For example "Friends of the Harbour" (FOTH) which was established in September 2003. is a non-profit making group subsidiary to the "Society for the Protection of the Harbour" which is a registered charity. Some other organizations such as ¡§Save Our Shorelines¡¨ are also formed. These organizations have some common beliefs such as that the Victoria Harbour is both locationally and morphologically the centre of Hong Kong it should be reserved for civic and leisure use by all Hong Kong people and under no circumstances should it be bitten away for commercial developments. In 1997 the Protection of Harbour Ordinance was passed endorsing principles of protecting the harbour. In 2003 the court ruled against the Town Planning Board on the Wanchai Reclamation Phase two project. However the Central Reclamation Phase three project was allowed to carry on and the government planned to continue to work on it. This triggered the protest in recent days. There is mainly three groups of people who are opposed the issue of reclamation namely environmental activists the democrats and the general public. Environmentalists mainly concern about the environmental impacts of the reclamation project. According to Lisa Hopkinson of the ¡§Friends of the harbour¡¨ the relentless increase in population living near the harbour causes serious pollution of the harbour the dumping of wastes near the harbour increases. In the past when the harbour is wider flushing effect of sea water can help to reduce the amount of the waste. However gradual narrowing of the harbour from reclamation has reduced the flushing action of tides whilst the number of toilets flushing into the harbour has increased. The result was poor water quality and limited marine life. Environmentalist also afraid that the loss of natural coastline caused by reclamation will result in a loss of important habitat and shallow feeding areas for many inter-tidal creatures that live in shallow sandy bays or on rocky shorelines. In addition the reclamation itself requires clean coarse sand often dredged from different more pristine parts of the ocean bed often at the cost of coral and other bottom-dwelling organisms. The environmentalists¡¦ concerns focus on the possible damage of the natural habitat and the deterioration of water quality. In my opinion their motivation of complaining the government is correct because there is no political reasons behind their point of views. Also many of them are professionals in environmental science they have the knowledge about how reclamation can affect the harbour. However there is one problem exists that is the environmentalists might ignore other aspects of the issue. They may not consider the present need of solving the congestion problem in central. At present the Connaught Road Central/Harcourt Road/Gloucester Road corridor is operating over its capacity and there is regular traffic congestion during the peak hours. Environmentalists may concern on environment more than problems on the other aspects. It can be misleading if only environmental problem is concerned. Democrats are also quite active in this issue. Martin Lee Chu-ming says the harbour was worth fighting for and that Hong Kong would be nothing if it were not for Victoria Harbour. However politicians usually speak for there parties and might want to gain support from the public by opposing government¡¦s policies. The general public also do not want to lose their harbour. For Hong Kong people it would be quite sad to see the harbour is narrowing and looks more and more like a river. The government has its own reason for reclamation. It¡¦s main reason for reclamation is to solve the congestion problem. According to some press releases and statement issued by the government. The government says it has thoroughly considered the presumption against reclamation under the Protection of the Harbour Ordinance. Central is full of buildings. On top of that the MTR Island line tunnel and other infrastructural facilities are already underground. Therefore it is impossible to build the bypass on existing land. If a new trunk road has to be built reclamation is the only solution. The government claims that it has done many studies on other possible solutions to the problem and has already consider the environmental factors before planning the reclamation. However the government has misled the public for many times. In the past there were some times that the government proposed the reclamation for meet the public¡¦s needs but after the reclamation were finished the government change the use of land. According to ¡¥The Friends of the Harbour¡¦ in West Kowloon Reclamation the government has promised public park to public but the area of reclamation has been re-zoned for commercial and cultural development. In Central Reclamation Phase I the former Central Bus Terminal and Yaumati Ferry Concourse have been re-zoned for commercial development and the bus terminal and ferry concourse will be moved to the new Central Reclamation Phase III. From these unpleasant history. It¡¦s quite hard to believe that the government¡¦s reclamation project is purely for the public¡¦s own good. In my opinion Hong Kong is a city renowned for its harbour the Victoria Harbour is actually a heritage of Hong Kong there is already many commercial building in Hong Kong it is not worth to landfill the harbour for any commercial proposes. Landfill that small area does not do much benefits to Hong Kong but the harm is unaffordable for us. Victoria Harbour is a world-class waterfront. It be returned to its people. |
| Kimmi | Posted on: Sun, 2 May 2004 21:20:08 +0800 |
From: |
保護海港協會，我支持你！希望你地救到維多利亞港，我唔想佢變成條河！香港人就係咁，成日都貪快，太自私！遲早大家會後悔！臭氧層穿咗個洞、樹林消失、海洋受污染、好多動植物已絕種或瀕臨絕種.....大家係咪想香港變成石屎森林，毫無生氣？班民主黨唔好成日為反對而反對！做埋D毫無建設性嘅嘢！長毛咁鐘意示威，攪風攪雨，仲有好多無聊人，一班唯恐天下不亂的人，你地既然咁得閒就 去保護海港！咁鐘意反對就去反對填海！鐘意示威就去為反對填海而示威！大家唔好成日狗咬狗骨，唯恐天下不亂，驚死香港唔夠衰。家和萬事興，家衰口不停！大家成熟D啦！唔好咁低能，外國人見到你哋班人都掩住半邊咀笑你哋呀！ 早D有建設性嘅嘢！一齊支持保護海港！！ |
| Ken H | Posted on: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:03:27 +0800 |
From:Accrington England |
I lived in HongKong in the 70s and I'm thinking of coming back to stay for the rest of my life. Could I live in hongkong as a brit is it easy to live your life in HongKong. Can anyone tell me if Stanley Services Boat Club is still being used. |
| Bear | Posted on: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 00:02:57 +0800 |
From:Hong Kong - Wong Tai Sin |
海港 是我們的 支持保護海港行動 我不明白 為什麼我們所謂的政府可以這樣 政府 不是管理地方的東西嗎? 為什麼她以凌駕市民自居? 不得民心的政府 從來都不是好的政府 她聽不出港人的心嗎? 她 真的是香港的政府嗎? 還是我們不是香港人 維港 天星碼頭 一切 十年後都變成只是回憶...... |
| F.3 s | Posted on: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:40:07 +0800 |
From: |
ello! We are a few F.3 students from SKH Bishop Mok Sau Tseng Secondary School in Tai Po. We are now conducting a survey on the problem that whether reclamation is the only way to solve the serious traffic congestion problem along the Victoria Harbour. We know that you strongly oppose the reclamation project. We also understand that the impacts caused by reclamation. But the traffic congestion problem is really very serious. Reclamation seems to be the only way to solve the problem now. But you strongly oppose it are there any other methods to solve the traffic congestion problem instead of reclamation? Please suggest us some your ideas for our project. And would you please give us some further information and opinions about your organisation? Thanks a lot! Looking forward to receiving your reply. |
| Mille | Posted on: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:07:26 +0800 |
From: |
The Millennium Tower is located in the Hong Kong Victoria Harbor. Will reclaimation proceed for this project and is this legal? Source: http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/eti/projects/towermain.html |
| Kelvi | Posted on: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:27:06 +0800 |
From: |
點解為維港激動？ 1. 盡量減少填海是為了保護香港獨特的公有資產及天然財產。 2. 維港是大自然送給香港人的禮物 它與美麗的山脈、土地及海洋相對 ，這樣令人驚嘆的景色世上少有，我們若破壞它，後果堪虞。 3. 維港也是天然財產，即使是多麼「有益處」的人工事物都不能取代它。 4. 天然財產意味?一代傳一代的延續性。維港的任何部份一經填海， 就會永遠消失於香港人眼前，亦從此消失於本港的財產之列。 5. 維港原本有約7 000 公頃面積 直至1990年超過2 500 公頃面積已被填平。但政府仍建議進一步填出1 297公(4?平方英里) 。直至1997年保護海港條例通過前 該建議中的填海工程已填出661公頃 使到海港原本面積約一半被填成土地。就算有保護海港條例限制 政府仍建議填出該計劃餘下的636公頃面積。 因此香港正面臨失去總面積3 800公頃(15平方英里)的海港 即超過原有面積的一半。 6. 為了保護維港而展開的社會運動始於1995年， 保護海港協會就是在當年成立，運動的目的是要確保維港 - 這個被定法例定為香港獨特的公有資產及天然財產 - 不被侵蝕，除非有不可爭議的理由 例如是為了興建絕對需要的基建設施。 香港人正為了保護及保存剩餘的壯麗海港而起來抗爭。 |
| someo | Posted on: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:21:33 +0800 |
From: |
since you guys are trying to find a way to break hkgov i got you a few suggestions. 1 take this harbour matter to beijing 2. take a look at the following and start doing what they are doing to help hkg and it people to speak up. in U.S. they have a org. call 'true majority'. what they really are doing is to collect the real majority of american to regain control of their national. http://action.truemajority.org/register/ below is the url to their view/solution to their naitonal number one problem. ( you really should look at it cos' you will learn something there.) http://www.truemajority.org/fun/ 3. collect enough donation then use it to publish a full page ads on every hk daily newspaper. and to call for the true and real hkg people majority to speak up and stand on our ground. and to show hkgov and china gov that hkgov do not speak for the true real majority of hkg people. best someone who love this harbour p.s. you may have to take this to beijing as a last resort. |
| Willi | Posted on: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:12:01 +0800 |
From:UK |
I really don't want to see the harbour to be come a river. people in uk and europe still want to come to hong kong to visit the unique natural resources. Destroy of this natural resources is also destroy the future of hong kong. STOP RECLAMATION NOW ! |
| hi | Posted on: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:56:07 +0800 |
From:oversea |
Excuse my english. Curious can the harbour be claim as world historic access? Can world environmental groups help? Is it helpful to acknowledge the china authorized party or environmental group by announcing worldwide chinese whom love the harbour each sending a letter to reflect public interest? Will insurance company accept harbour destruction application? Is it 100% sure reconstruction of harbour doing no harm to hk sea life? May God bless our harbour it is not for us but for our future generation. Like mr. Cheung in 881 said it is each and every of us responsibilities in protect our harbour. |
| 阿文� | Posted on: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:45:58 +0800 |
From: |
我想去的……但只有我自己一個……有點兒怯 |
| Janet | Posted on: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:39:55 +0800 |
From: |
聽日321 我好想去呀!不過功課太多 實在黎唔到!希望多d人參加 等政府清楚我地既決心! 政府係屬於人民 海港都係屬於香港人 政府無我地同意佢有乜權話填就填?! 我精神上支持你地 大家加油呀! |
| Admin | Posted on: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:12:35 +0800 |
From: |
各保護維港之支持者: 請出席3月21日之手牽手護維港之行動，並呼籲身邊朋友參加。 保護維港行動. Date: Sunday 21st March 2004 Time: 3:00 p.m. Venue: Edinburgh Place Central Organiser: Central Western District Council Participants must wear blue color clothes |
| 葉宇 | Posted on: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:23:32 +0800 |
From: |
THE HK GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT DESTROY OUR NATURAL RESOURCES THE SEA IS OUR UNLIMITED CAPITAL. FOR SUPPORTING IT I HOPE THAT THE ASSOCIATION OF HARBOUR CAN WIN THE [ WAR ] |
| G | Posted on: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:18:02 +0800 |
From: |
It is the job of the Hong Kong Government to protect and to preserve our harbour. Our harbour is as mentioned in one of the posts one of Hong Kong's most valuable asset and a natural heritage. How can the government desecrate the harbour with its own selfish commercial agenda and neglect the fact that the Harbour belongs to the people and the people want the Harbour to be preserved. All that is required is for the Govt to read the newspaper to find out what the public wants....which is . Still the HK government turn a blind eye..... what kind of Government is this. I speculate that the HK government is pleasing those commercial conglomerates (property developers) with its plan to reclaim almost all or most of the Harbour. I mean Why reclaim when there is land outside the city centre? Why make the city ever more congested? Why not allow the city grow outward? Why pollute the air in the city centre even more? Why pollute the harbour? The answer is simple. Because the land outside the city is cheap and no developer wants those land. Developers want land that will provide them with handsome profits. The Government is a weakling and bowing down to the wishes of the developers..... Who thinks about the people of Hong Kong?! Who thinks about the environmental damage of reclaiming the harbour?! Who thinks about the health problems by making the city ever more congested?! No one....what kind of Government is the HK Government? I am glad that someone has taken up this unjust reclamation of one of Hong Kong's natural Heritage and challenge the government. If not the Victoria Harbour as we know it will be soon become Victoria River or even Victoria Stream.... |
| Kelly | Posted on: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:16:04 +0800 |
From: |
There is no excuse for any further reclaimation to the Victoria Harbour. The Government should look for other alternative to solve the problems which are being used as excuse for the reclaimation. |
| adam | Posted on: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:14:18 +0800 |
From:kowloon |
i travel a lot to many other waterfront cities and it ashames me as a Hong kong resident to say that we have destroyed our jewel our harbour. what sort of planning disctates that we should run highways along the water instead of turning it into leisure and recreational areas as well as outside eating. we have missed the opportunity so far but maybe with this new force in public thinking it is not too late to recover some ground.....? need to have more demos more publicity about them in advance would be good though! |
| 徐律師 | Posted on: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 22:30:43 +0800 |
From: |
徐律師保護海港的熱情令人感動，支持你！ |
| Tsang | Posted on: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:57:17 +0800 |
From: |
Victoria Harbour is beautiful & great! I just wish everyone will love it and to preserve it. I will surely support "Friends of the Harbour"!!! |
| simon | Posted on: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:46:33 +0800 |
From:shenzhen china |
To protect the victoria harbour is all the love hongkong people obligation.If victoria harbour be destroyed that is harm to hongkong. |
| D | Posted on: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 07:19:32 +0800 |
From: |
One thing is about the govt. is that they are so sneaky. You really have to dig deep into their proposals to realise that what they intend to build and is not shown on their proposals is a navy base for the fkin PLA... that is just stupid.. fkin PLA!!! I mean come on... second thing I PREY that if they move the public piers (Queens Pier) out that they keep the pier's name as Queens Pier. Not rename it to Mao's Pier or something.. I tell you this govt. is so sneaky its ridiculous. |
| chan | Posted on: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:41:19 +0800 |
From:Hing Kong |
孫公話”政府和市民一樣珍惜海港 並且有責任保護海港 現時的規劃概念是要使維港具有吸引力和活力 令市民和遊客可以接近海邊 達到「還港於民」的目的.”佢又話”即將展開的香港二○三○研究第三階段公眾諮詢中，市民可清晰及具體了解政府保護海港的決心.”講得鬼咁好聽 差D以為係真o既添! 如果真係咁珍惜…咁有責任心…同埋咁有決心保護海港 咁就馬上停止填海工程 講係無用 我都識講呀! 唔駛做咁多無謂o野 只要維港保持現貌 已具有無比的吸引力及活力了 不用多此一舉 更不要浪費公帑 市民及遊客要接近海邊 不是在維港 維港兩旁不應叫海邊 有船泊岸 應叫海港. 香港最值得遊客觀看的是兩岸的五光十色…價值連城的夜景 夜景為何咁美 係因為地理因素 有些地方夜景很美 但始終沒有香港獨有的維港穿插其中倒影夜景 再者 接近海邊不是在維港兩岸 而係要指引他們去赤柱 石澳 淺水灣等地方 讓尊貴的遊客們在香港多走幾個旅遊點 帶旺香港經濟. 這樣更有意義. 講到底 破壞o左o既o野點都還原唔到 無論政府幾有決心及責任心 都係無濟於事! |
| Chan | Posted on: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:33:12 +0800 |
From:hong kong |
This is very good work keep it up |
| 愛港 | Posted on: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:51:00 +0800 |
From: |
孫公話”政府和市民一樣珍惜海港 並且有責任保護海港 現時的規劃概念是要使維港具有吸引力和活力 令市民和遊客可以接近海邊 達到「還港於民」的目的.”佢又話”即將展開的香港二○三○研究第三階段公眾諮詢中，市民可清晰及具體了解政府保護海港的決心.”講得鬼咁好聽 差D以為係真o既添! 如果真係咁珍惜…咁有責任心…同埋咁有決心保護海港 咁就馬上停止填海工程 講係無用 我都識講呀! 唔駛做咁多無謂o野 只要維港保持現貌 已具有無比的吸引力及活力了 不用多此一舉 更不要浪費公帑 市民及遊客要接近海邊 不是在維港 維港兩旁不應叫海邊 有船泊岸 應叫海港. 香港最值得遊客觀看的是兩岸的五光十色…價值連城的夜景 夜景為何咁美 係因為地理因素 有些地方夜景很美 但始終沒有香港獨有的維港穿插其中倒影夜景 再者 接近海邊不是在維港兩岸 而係要指引他們去赤柱 石澳 淺水灣等地方 讓尊貴的遊客們在香港多走幾個旅遊點 帶旺香港經濟. 這樣更有意義. 講到底 破壞o左o既o野點都還原唔到 無論政府幾有決心及責任心 都係無濟於事! |
| hk ne | Posted on: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 22:34:32 +0800 |
From: |
中環填海市民可表意見 (文匯報 4/11/03) 本報訊】（記者 梁祖蓮）立法會環境事務委員會與規劃地政及工程事務委員會邀請各界 人士及有興趣的團體，就中環填海工程第III期及灣仔發展計劃第II期發表意見。有興趣的 人士請於本月17日或之前，把意見書送交立法會環境事務委員會秘書，並請表明是否有意 出席本月27日下午4時30分至6時30分在立法會會議廳舉行的聯席會議。有關討論只限於政 策事宜，例如是否需要填海、填海範圍，以及諮詢公眾機制等。 Translation from Newspaper 'Wen Wei Po' HongKongers could express their opinions against Central Reclamation (Wen Wei Po 4/11/03) Panel on Environmental Affairs and Panel on Planning Lands and works of Legislative Council invite HongKongers and Groups which would like to express their opinions against Central and Wanchai Reclamation project. Interested parties should send out their opinions to Panel on Environmental Affairs before 17 November and state that whether attend the meeting on 27 Nov 4:30 to 6:30pm at Legislative Council discussing about policies such as the need of reclamation the scope of reclamation and public consultation system. |
| Mary | Posted on: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:56:19 +0800 |
From:HKG |
政府千萬不可以用加費來疏導交通 以前話紅磡海底隧道塞車嚴重 走去加隧道收費 但大家都見到紅隧咪又係日日塞車 哂氣! 如果政府再用加費或用徵收路費來疏導交通 即是把公共道路變成有錢人專線. 話明收費 重要收得貴 有錢人先可以支付路費 咁即係擺明車馬為有錢人設立貴人區 而家經濟咁差 仲成日話收什麼什麼費 加什麼什麼價 可以負擔比得起路費 除o左有錢人外 唔通係D小市民咩! |
| Mary | Posted on: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:47:56 +0800 |
From: |
香港政府填海行為要不得 建橋築路不是借口. 香港地 塞車無日無之 所有主要交通道路 有邊一條唔塞車 尤其是在繁忙時間. 香港地少人多係人都知 填海唔係辦法 再填除o左破壞維港美景外 重會破壞環境 可以唔填就唔好填啦 點解明知唔o岩都仲死撐. 政府點解唔起多D鐵路 然後用巴士作接駁偏遠地區到鐵路站來疏導交通 這才是明智之舉. 政府不可以再批准巴士公司加任何新的巴士線路 (其實應該開始減巴士線及重新整理及編排巴士路線 根本有很多巴士線是重疊o左 又有D線路兜遍香港九龍才能到達目的地 嚴重阻塞路面) 香港的巴士實在多得嚇死人 除o左因為塞車而要填海的中� |